The Financial Horizons
No Result
View All Result
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Latest News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Latest News
No Result
View All Result
The Financial Horizons
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest News

House Republicans introduce bill to repurchase Panama Canal after Trump raises concerns of Chinese control

by
January 9, 2025
in Latest News
0
House Republicans introduce bill to repurchase Panama Canal after Trump raises concerns of Chinese control
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

House Republicans on Thursday introduced a bill for the United States to repurchase the Panama Canal after President-elect Trump raised concerns that the critical waterway is under Chinese control. 

The bill, named the Panama Canal Repurchase Act, was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., a member of the Select Committee on China and the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. 

‘President Trump is right to consider repurchasing the Panama Canal,’ Johnson said in a statement. ‘China’s interest in and presence around the canal is a cause for concern. America must project strength abroad – owning and operating the Panama Canal might be an important step towards a stronger America and a more secure globe.’

The bill has 15 other Republican co-sponsors: Reps. Dan Crenshaw, Randy Weber, Troy Nehls and Brian Babin of Texas; Mike Collins, Barry Loudermilk and Andrew Clyde of Georgia; Barry Moore of Alabama; Jack Bergman of Michigan; Mike Rulli of Ohio; Neal Dunn and Aaron Bean of Florida; Erin Houchin of Indiana; Abraham Hamadeh of Arizona; and Mike Lawler of New York. 

If it becomes law, the bill would give the president authority to act in coordination with the secretary of state, to ‘initiate and conduct negotiations with appropriate counterparts of the Government of the Republic of Panama to reacquire the Panama Canal.’

From the date the measure is enacted, the president has 180 days to submit a report to Congress detailing the progress of the negotiations, potential challenges and anticipated outcomes.

The U.S. Department of State estimates around 72% of all vessels that travel through the Panama Canal are coming from or going to a U.S. port. 

Noting the canal’s strategic importance to the United States, Johnson’s office also noted how the waterway is a key transit point for U.S. Coast Guard and Department of Defense vessels. 

Without access to the canal, ships would be forced to travel 8,000 additional miles around South America. 

‘More than 10,000 ships use the Panama Canal each year, generating billions of dollars of tolls which would economically benefit America,’ Johnson’s office said. 

At a press conference from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, Trump was asked if he would assure the world he would not use ‘military or economic coercion’ to gain control of the Panama Canal, as well as Greenland. 

‘No, I can’t assure you on either of those two. But, I can say this. We need them for economic security. The Panama Canal was built for our military,’ Trump said. ‘Look, the Panama Canal is vital to our country. It’s being operated by China. China. And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama. We didn’t give it to China. And they’ve abused it. They’ve abused that gift. It should have never been made.’ 

The Panamanian government has denied that China is controlling the Panama Canal, which the United States relinquished on the last day of 1999 under a treaty negotiated decades before by the late former President Jimmy Carter. 

Johnson’s office referenced China’s growing influence in the region around the Panama Canal. 

‘In 2018, Panama was the first country in Latin America to join the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) Belt and Road Initiative, and investments from PRC firms in canal infrastructure has only increased since. Further, PRC companies have managing rights for the two ports on either side of the canal,’ the congressman’s office wrote. 

Two seaports on either side of the Panama Canal have been run for decades by the Hong-Kong-based company Hutchison Ports PPC, the New York Times reported. 

The newspaper highlighted how the Chinese government has increasingly implemented its national security laws on the island of Hong Kong that can force companies to comply with intelligence-gathering and military operations. 

Related Topics

Trump Transition
China
Latin America
Hong Kong
National Security
State Department

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

Russia monitoring Trump’s ‘dramatic’ comments on Greenland acquisition

Next Post

Trump, Pence shake hands at Carter funeral in first public meeting since leaving office

Next Post
Trump, Pence shake hands at Carter funeral in first public meeting since leaving office

Trump, Pence shake hands at Carter funeral in first public meeting since leaving office

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent News

    Hawley urges DHS Secretary Noem to declassify all Trump Butler rally assassination attempt documents

    Hawley urges DHS Secretary Noem to declassify all Trump Butler rally assassination attempt documents

    July 15, 2025
    Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal

    Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal

    July 14, 2025
    ‘Held accountable’: Sen. Rand Paul again vows to issue a criminal referral for Fauci

    ‘Held accountable’: Sen. Rand Paul again vows to issue a criminal referral for Fauci

    July 14, 2025
    Pentagon presses Japan, Australia on role in possible Taiwan conflict

    Pentagon presses Japan, Australia on role in possible Taiwan conflict

    July 14, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: Thefinancialhorizons.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thefinancialhorizons.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Latest News

    Disclaimer: Thefinancialhorizons.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thefinancialhorizons.com | All Rights Reserved